JOHN EDWARDS III (d. 1625 ), son of the above, at first followed his father in outward conformity, becoming a county magistrate (by 1595 ) and having also parliamentary ambitions, for which he prepared the way soon after his succession by granting leases with the written provision that the tenant should vote as his landlord directed ( E.H.R. , lxv, 221-2). In 1588 he set up as candidate for the shire against WILLIAM ALMER of Pant Iocyn ( see the article on that family ), backed by the powerful Protestant influence of Salusbury of Llewenni , and, with the aid of his own Protestant father-in-law, Roger Puleston of Emral (elected for Flintshire ), and the Catholic vote of Chirkland , he carried the day. Almer challenged the return in Star Chamber as irregular, an action which Puleston denounced in the Commons as a breach of privilege, but the session was over before a decision was reached. The whole county was stirred by the issue, and many riots and lawsuits ensued. In these and in later Star Chamber actions — one in which lord S. John of Bletsoe proceeded against Edwards ( 1594 ) for disorderly resistance to his rights as lord of Chirkland in succession to Leicester , and another ( 1595 ) in which Edwards 's conduct as magistrate was impugned — much was made of his recusant background. His outward conformity ceased when, after Gunpowder Plot , new recusancy laws imposed a sacramental test and a new oath of allegiance. He was attainted and fined two-thirds of his estate under the Act ( 1614 ), and next year the elder Sir T. Myddelton , whose son's conduct as lord of Chirkland and owner of Chirk castle had been opposed by Edwards , denounced him as a ‘dangerous recusant’ whom it would be ‘mischievous’ to pardon. Alleged breaches of the peace when Plas Newydd was entered by sheriff's officers in search of recusants , and Edwards denounced them to Great Sessions , led to a further prosecution in Star Chamber by the Attorney-General ( 1619 ), and imprisonment in the Marshalsea . At the same time he was at odds with his own son and heir, who in 1624 petitioned Parliament for a Bill to reverse a degree for settlement of the estate which his father had obtained in the Court of Requests , the matter being eventually referred to arbitration by the Lords . In the midst of these troubles Edwards d. in London .
His son, JOHN EDWARDS IV (d. 1646 ), returned to the practice of conformity (doubtless the cause of the family quarrel). But he got the better of Myddelton in a contest over water rights, and as commissioner of array helped to raise forces against him in Denbighshire on the outbreak of civil war. For this a fine of £80 (at the rate of one-tenth) was levied on the estate in 1649 in the time of his son JOHN EDWARDS V (d. 1674 ), who, after being reconciled both to the Commonwealth (which he served as sheriff in 1633 ) and to the Myddeltons , was protected from further molestation. The line came to an end in 1685 and the estate passed by marriage to the Pulestons , who sold the New Hall estate in 1721 with the consent of the representative of the original stock in the male line, FRANCIS EDWARDES (d. 1725 ), M.P. for Haverfordwest , 1722-5 . He had inherited the Pembrokeshire estates through his great-grandmother, who had m. a younger son of Plas Newydd early in the 17th cent. Francis Edwardes 's marriage with the daughter and heiress of Robert Rich , 5th earl of Warwick , brought to his son WILLIAM EDWARDES in 1776 the Kensington estates of the Riches and the title ‘ baron Kensington ’ in the Irish peerage. The family kept its Pembrokeshire seat, frequently providing the county with lords-lieutenant and Haverfordwest with burgesses in Parliament until separate representation of the borough ceased in 1885 , whereupon WILLIAM EDWARDES , 5th baron Kensington (d. 1900 ), was made a peer of the United Kingdom .
Emeritus Professor Arthur Herbert Dodd, M.A., (1891-1975), Bangor
Published date: 1959